<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (12) TMI 51 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42681</link>
    <description>An appeal dismissed only for delay, without examination of merits, was held unwarranted where conditional condonation could balance the lapse with the interests of justice. The delay was condoned, the appeal was restored for decision on merits, and compliance with deposit and bank guarantee conditions was required. Once restoration was directed, the stay order ceased to survive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 16:02:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81210" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (12) TMI 51 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42681</link>
      <description>An appeal dismissed only for delay, without examination of merits, was held unwarranted where conditional condonation could balance the lapse with the interests of justice. The delay was condoned, the appeal was restored for decision on merits, and compliance with deposit and bank guarantee conditions was required. Once restoration was directed, the stay order ceased to survive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42681</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>