https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42675 The court found in favor of the petitioner, criticizing the respondents for their inaction and failure to engage in the adjudication process. The court granted relief to the petitioner through a writ of mandamus for a refund, highlighting the lack of proactive steps taken by the respondents and emphasizing the importance of honoring representations made by the government. The court made the rule absolute, commanding the respondents to refund the wrongfully realized amount to the petitioner within a specified timeframe, with no order as to costs. en-us Thu, 02 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 12 Jun 2010 15:52:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42675 The court found in favor of the petitioner, criticizing the respondents for their inaction and failure to engage in the adjudication process. The court granted relief to the petitioner through a writ of mandamus for a refund, highlighting the lack of proactive steps taken by the respondents and emphasizing the importance of honoring representations made by the government. The court made the rule absolute, commanding the respondents to refund the wrongfully realized amount to the petitioner within a specified timeframe, with no order as to costs. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 02 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42675