https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768325 A written communication that recognises a subsisting demand and states that payment is withheld because a related challenge is pending can amount to acknowledgment of liability under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, extending limitation from the date of that writing. In parallel, where recovery proceedings under the Public Premises Act depend directly on pending intra-court appeals concerning retrospective tariff revision, the proceedings should await the outcome of those appeals. The document states that the impugned order was set aside and the writ petitions were restored for reconsideration after disposal of the connected appeals. en-us Thu, 03 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 Apr 2025 08:23:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768325 A written communication that recognises a subsisting demand and states that payment is withheld because a related challenge is pending can amount to acknowledgment of liability under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, extending limitation from the date of that writing. In parallel, where recovery proceedings under the Public Premises Act depend directly on pending intra-court appeals concerning retrospective tariff revision, the proceedings should await the outcome of those appeals. The document states that the impugned order was set aside and the writ petitions were restored for reconsideration after disposal of the connected appeals. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 03 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768325