<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 256 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768342</link>
    <description>HC allowed petition for provisional release of seized LED lighting goods under Section 110A of Customs Act, 1962. Goods were seized for alleged undervaluation and customs duty evasion. Court held that adjudicating authority has discretion to release goods on bond with security and conditions. Despite goods not meeting BIS standards, provisional release was granted to petitioner subject to fulfillment of imposed conditions and security requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2025 08:23:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=812001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 256 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768342</link>
      <description>HC allowed petition for provisional release of seized LED lighting goods under Section 110A of Customs Act, 1962. Goods were seized for alleged undervaluation and customs duty evasion. Court held that adjudicating authority has discretion to release goods on bond with security and conditions. Despite goods not meeting BIS standards, provisional release was granted to petitioner subject to fulfillment of imposed conditions and security requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768342</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>