<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (2) TMI 78 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42671</link>
    <description>The court quashed both the appellate and revisional orders due to inadequate reasoning and lack of detailed analysis. The matter was remanded back to the appellate authority for proper disposal, emphasizing the need for a thorough exercise of appellate powers. The petitioners were granted the opportunity to present further evidence at the appellate stage, with a directive for expedient resolution to ensure a fair hearing and timely decision-making process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 15:41:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81200" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (2) TMI 78 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42671</link>
      <description>The court quashed both the appellate and revisional orders due to inadequate reasoning and lack of detailed analysis. The matter was remanded back to the appellate authority for proper disposal, emphasizing the need for a thorough exercise of appellate powers. The petitioners were granted the opportunity to present further evidence at the appellate stage, with a directive for expedient resolution to ensure a fair hearing and timely decision-making process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42671</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>