<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 298 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768384</link>
    <description>HC dismissed the petition challenging a tax assessment order, directing the petitioner to pursue the statutory appeal remedy. Despite acknowledging potential procedural irregularities, the court held that the issues involved mixed questions of law and fact best addressed through the appellate process. The petitioner was granted four weeks to file an appeal, with instructions for expedited resolution by the Appellate Authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2025 08:23:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=811959" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 298 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768384</link>
      <description>HC dismissed the petition challenging a tax assessment order, directing the petitioner to pursue the statutory appeal remedy. Despite acknowledging potential procedural irregularities, the court held that the issues involved mixed questions of law and fact best addressed through the appellate process. The petitioner was granted four weeks to file an appeal, with instructions for expedited resolution by the Appellate Authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768384</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>