<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 302 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768388</link>
    <description>The SC revoked the petitioner&#039;s GST registration cancellation, finding the non-filing of returns was due to genuine circumstances like a director&#039;s death. The court conditionally reinstated the registration, requiring the petitioner to file outstanding returns, pay due taxes with interest within four weeks, and comply with specific Input Tax Credit restrictions. The ruling emphasized taxpayer cooperation and opportunity to rectify non-compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2025 14:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=811955" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 302 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768388</link>
      <description>The SC revoked the petitioner&#039;s GST registration cancellation, finding the non-filing of returns was due to genuine circumstances like a director&#039;s death. The court conditionally reinstated the registration, requiring the petitioner to file outstanding returns, pay due taxes with interest within four weeks, and comply with specific Input Tax Credit restrictions. The ruling emphasized taxpayer cooperation and opportunity to rectify non-compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768388</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>