https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461399 Article 226 judicial review remains available against Armed Forces Tribunal orders, because the constitutional power is part of the basic structure and cannot be curtailed by implication or by a restrictive reading of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007. Article 227(4) limits superintendence only and does not extinguish writ jurisdiction, while the appellate scheme under Sections 30 and 31, read with Article 136(2), does not create a complete ouster of High Court review. The High Court may intervene for denial of fundamental rights, jurisdictional error, or an error of law apparent on the face of the record, subject to judicial self-restraint. en-us Tue, 21 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Apr 2025 19:16:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461399 Article 226 judicial review remains available against Armed Forces Tribunal orders, because the constitutional power is part of the basic structure and cannot be curtailed by implication or by a restrictive reading of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007. Article 227(4) limits superintendence only and does not extinguish writ jurisdiction, while the appellate scheme under Sections 30 and 31, read with Article 136(2), does not create a complete ouster of High Court review. The High Court may intervene for denial of fundamental rights, jurisdictional error, or an error of law apparent on the face of the record, subject to judicial self-restraint. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 21 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461399