<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 2059 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461401</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi held that an assessment completed without proper service of statutory notice under Section 143(2) within the limitation period was invalid. Since none of the three notices claimed to be served within the limitation period were actually served upon the assessee, the assessment was set aside. The tribunal deleted all disputed additions and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling that proper service of notice is mandatory for a valid assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2025 19:16:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=811889" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 2059 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461401</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi held that an assessment completed without proper service of statutory notice under Section 143(2) within the limitation period was invalid. Since none of the three notices claimed to be served within the limitation period were actually served upon the assessee, the assessment was set aside. The tribunal deleted all disputed additions and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling that proper service of notice is mandatory for a valid assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461401</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>