https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42655 In preventive detention, delay in passing or executing the order is not automatically fatal; it matters only if the grounds become stale or the live and proximate link with the prejudicial act is broken, and the delay here was held not to invalidate the detention. Non-supply of the bail application and bail order, however, was treated as a breach of Article 22(5) because those were vital relied-upon materials needed for an effective representation. The omission left the grounds incomplete and vitiated the continued detention, making the detention unsustainable. en-us Wed, 31 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Jul 2014 08:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42655 In preventive detention, delay in passing or executing the order is not automatically fatal; it matters only if the grounds become stale or the live and proximate link with the prejudicial act is broken, and the delay here was held not to invalidate the detention. Non-supply of the bail application and bail order, however, was treated as a breach of Article 22(5) because those were vital relied-upon materials needed for an effective representation. The omission left the grounds incomplete and vitiated the continued detention, making the detention unsustainable. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 31 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42655