https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42650 A writ of prohibition is an exceptional remedy and will not issue as of right. The Court upheld the respondents' jurisdiction to investigate the petitioner's import transactions and rejected the argument that their authority was confined to the Union Territory of Delhi. It further noted that, where economic offences are suspected, judicial interference with an ongoing investigation should be limited in public interest. The petitioner was left free to challenge any consequential action at the appropriate stage, and the request to restrain the investigation was rejected. en-us Tue, 11 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 12 Jun 2010 14:16:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42650 A writ of prohibition is an exceptional remedy and will not issue as of right. The Court upheld the respondents' jurisdiction to investigate the petitioner's import transactions and rejected the argument that their authority was confined to the Union Territory of Delhi. It further noted that, where economic offences are suspected, judicial interference with an ongoing investigation should be limited in public interest. The petitioner was left free to challenge any consequential action at the appropriate stage, and the request to restrain the investigation was rejected. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 11 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42650