<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (1) TMI 140 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42648</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, indicating that the petitioners could challenge any adverse order in the adjudication proceedings through appellate mechanisms under the Customs Act. The court found no violation of natural justice and noted that the respondent had not made a final decision on the petitioners&#039; application for document production.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 14:12:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81177" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (1) TMI 140 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42648</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, indicating that the petitioners could challenge any adverse order in the adjudication proceedings through appellate mechanisms under the Customs Act. The court found no violation of natural justice and noted that the respondent had not made a final decision on the petitioners&#039; application for document production.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42648</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>