<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (1) TMI 71 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42640</link>
    <description>Section 4 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 requires excisable goods to be valued at the normal wholesale price where the buyer is not a related person and price is the sole consideration. Once the distributors were found not to be related persons, excise duty collected on the higher value based on their resale price became excess levy and was refundable. The protest against payment was read broadly and was not confined to one class of sales, so it covered all payments made on the related-person basis. Rule 233B of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 did not require any special form of protest and did not aid the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2014 08:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81169" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (1) TMI 71 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42640</link>
      <description>Section 4 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 requires excisable goods to be valued at the normal wholesale price where the buyer is not a related person and price is the sole consideration. Once the distributors were found not to be related persons, excise duty collected on the higher value based on their resale price became excess levy and was refundable. The protest against payment was read broadly and was not confined to one class of sales, so it covered all payments made on the related-person basis. Rule 233B of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 did not require any special form of protest and did not aid the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42640</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>