<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 180 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768266</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit cannot be denied solely because original duty-paying documents were not produced when receipt and use of the input services are otherwise established. The record showed that the services were received and used for providing output services, and Revenue produced no evidence to discredit the claim or show that the services were not actually received. Where verification is possible through other reliable material, absence of original invoices by itself is insufficient to reject credit. On that basis, the denial of Cenvat credit was held unsustainable, the credit was allowed, and the related penalty under Section 78 was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2025 07:15:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=811668" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 180 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768266</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit cannot be denied solely because original duty-paying documents were not produced when receipt and use of the input services are otherwise established. The record showed that the services were received and used for providing output services, and Revenue produced no evidence to discredit the claim or show that the services were not actually received. Where verification is possible through other reliable material, absence of original invoices by itself is insufficient to reject credit. On that basis, the denial of Cenvat credit was held unsustainable, the credit was allowed, and the related penalty under Section 78 was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768266</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>