<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 192 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768278</link>
    <description>Delhi HC disposed of an appeal challenging imposition of anti-dumping duty on Styrene Butadiene Rubber imports from European Union, Korea RP and Thailand. The domestic industry withdrew its demand for ADD after initially seeking protection. Court held the matter became infructuous as no party pressed for duty imposition. However, provisionally released goods under CESTAT conditions required final assessment orders considering the industry&#039;s withdrawal of ADD demand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2025 07:15:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=811656" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 192 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768278</link>
      <description>Delhi HC disposed of an appeal challenging imposition of anti-dumping duty on Styrene Butadiene Rubber imports from European Union, Korea RP and Thailand. The domestic industry withdrew its demand for ADD after initially seeking protection. Court held the matter became infructuous as no party pressed for duty imposition. However, provisionally released goods under CESTAT conditions required final assessment orders considering the industry&#039;s withdrawal of ADD demand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768278</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>