<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 194 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768280</link>
    <description>In an exemption notification, the word &quot;and&quot; in the entry for &quot;MIMO and LTE Products&quot; was construed conjunctively on its plain language and the notification as a whole, so the exclusion applied only to products combining both technologies. A later clarificatory amendment was treated as reflecting pre-existing ambiguity rather than expanding the earlier exclusion. Goods using MIMO technology but not LTE standard therefore fell outside the exclusion and remained entitled to Basic Customs Duty exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 14:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=811654" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 194 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768280</link>
      <description>In an exemption notification, the word &quot;and&quot; in the entry for &quot;MIMO and LTE Products&quot; was construed conjunctively on its plain language and the notification as a whole, so the exclusion applied only to products combining both technologies. A later clarificatory amendment was treated as reflecting pre-existing ambiguity rather than expanding the earlier exclusion. Goods using MIMO technology but not LTE standard therefore fell outside the exclusion and remained entitled to Basic Customs Duty exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768280</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>