<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (8) TMI 89 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42635</link>
    <description>Binding departmental instructions requiring one month to reply to a Central Excise show cause notice must be followed, and a notice granting only ten days is procedurally defective. Where the assessee is denied the prescribed opportunity to respond, the defect goes to the validity of the notice and also taints any consequential order passed on it, including withdrawal of exemption from filing price lists. The text states that the instructions were treated as binding on the Collector, and non-compliance rendered both the notice and the resulting order liable to be quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 13:34:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81164" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (8) TMI 89 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42635</link>
      <description>Binding departmental instructions requiring one month to reply to a Central Excise show cause notice must be followed, and a notice granting only ten days is procedurally defective. Where the assessee is denied the prescribed opportunity to respond, the defect goes to the validity of the notice and also taints any consequential order passed on it, including withdrawal of exemption from filing price lists. The text states that the instructions were treated as binding on the Collector, and non-compliance rendered both the notice and the resulting order liable to be quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42635</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>