<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 216 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768302</link>
    <description>The HC upheld the assessee&#039;s method of calculating deductions under Section 36(1)(viii) of the Income Tax Act despite not maintaining separate accounts for eligible business. The Court found that estimating expenses by applying the ratio of total business expenses to income was reasonable when accounts showed gross income and expenditure for the entire business. The HC rejected Revenue&#039;s argument that absence of separate accounting could lead to inaccuracies, ruling that the proportional estimation method was justified and aligned with statutory objectives. The appeal was dismissed with questions of law answered in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2025 07:15:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=811632" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 216 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768302</link>
      <description>The HC upheld the assessee&#039;s method of calculating deductions under Section 36(1)(viii) of the Income Tax Act despite not maintaining separate accounts for eligible business. The Court found that estimating expenses by applying the ratio of total business expenses to income was reasonable when accounts showed gross income and expenditure for the entire business. The HC rejected Revenue&#039;s argument that absence of separate accounting could lead to inaccuracies, ruling that the proportional estimation method was justified and aligned with statutory objectives. The appeal was dismissed with questions of law answered in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768302</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>