<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (6) TMI 67 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42634</link>
    <description>The writ petition concerned entitlement to a carry on business licence and concessional import duty, not the independent clearance of goods on additional licences under paragraphs 215 and 216 of the Import and Export Policy, 1988-1991. The Court held that the petitioners had cleared the imported goods on payment of full customs duty under those licences, so a separate application seeking restraint on clearance and removal of the goods was outside the scope of the pending writ petition. The Court also declined to express any view on the legality of the Collector of Customs&#039; release order in that proceeding. The application was held not maintainable and dismissed, and the interim restraint order was vacated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 13:22:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81163" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (6) TMI 67 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42634</link>
      <description>The writ petition concerned entitlement to a carry on business licence and concessional import duty, not the independent clearance of goods on additional licences under paragraphs 215 and 216 of the Import and Export Policy, 1988-1991. The Court held that the petitioners had cleared the imported goods on payment of full customs duty under those licences, so a separate application seeking restraint on clearance and removal of the goods was outside the scope of the pending writ petition. The Court also declined to express any view on the legality of the Collector of Customs&#039; release order in that proceeding. The application was held not maintainable and dismissed, and the interim restraint order was vacated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42634</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>