<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (10) TMI 50 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42633</link>
    <description>Bail granted in a grave and organised narcotics smuggling case was cancelled because the material indicated coordinated trafficking, concealed packaging, specialised equipment, and a real apprehension that the accused might abscond or continue similar offences if released. The High Court held that the Magistrate had granted bail without sufficient circumspection, especially given the seriousness of the conspiracy investigation and the statutory framework governing cancellation. Exercising inherent and supervisory jurisdiction under Section 439(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, the Court ordered cancellation of the bail orders and directed custody of the accused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 13:20:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81162" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (10) TMI 50 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42633</link>
      <description>Bail granted in a grave and organised narcotics smuggling case was cancelled because the material indicated coordinated trafficking, concealed packaging, specialised equipment, and a real apprehension that the accused might abscond or continue similar offences if released. The High Court held that the Magistrate had granted bail without sufficient circumspection, especially given the seriousness of the conspiracy investigation and the statutory framework governing cancellation. Exercising inherent and supervisory jurisdiction under Section 439(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, the Court ordered cancellation of the bail orders and directed custody of the accused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42633</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>