https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768318 HC held the officer appointed under Section 6 of the KGST is a proper officer under Section 4 of the IGST and therefore empowered to exercise IGST powers. The petition challenging a confiscation order under Section 130 KGST (exercised under IGST) is not maintainable before the HC in view of the alternate statutory remedy; the petitioner must file an appeal under Section 107 of the KGST (read with Section 20 IGST). Petition dismissed; four weeks granted to file the appeal. en-us Wed, 05 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Nov 2025 14:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768318 HC held the officer appointed under Section 6 of the KGST is a proper officer under Section 4 of the IGST and therefore empowered to exercise IGST powers. The petition challenging a confiscation order under Section 130 KGST (exercised under IGST) is not maintainable before the HC in view of the alternate statutory remedy; the petitioner must file an appeal under Section 107 of the KGST (read with Section 20 IGST). Petition dismissed; four weeks granted to file the appeal. Case-Laws GST Wed, 05 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768318