<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (1) TMI 70 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42632</link>
    <description>SC held that the goods in question are classifiable under tariff item 28AA(iv) (pipe fittings) and not as separate pipe/tube items; entries in the Harmonised System and CCCN were found unhelpful for the domestic comprehensive entry. The Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s contrary view, accepted the assessee&#039;s classification, and directed modification of excise assessments accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2025 22:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81161" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (1) TMI 70 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42632</link>
      <description>SC held that the goods in question are classifiable under tariff item 28AA(iv) (pipe fittings) and not as separate pipe/tube items; entries in the Harmonised System and CCCN were found unhelpful for the domestic comprehensive entry. The Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s contrary view, accepted the assessee&#039;s classification, and directed modification of excise assessments accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42632</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>