<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 1543 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461394</link>
    <description>Imported Wireless Access Points/MIMO products under CTI 8517 62 90 were considered eligible for exemption under the notification dated 01.03.2005, as amended on 11.07.2014, because the Tribunal followed its earlier view that WAPs working on the relevant technology and not supporting LTE standard fell within Serial No. 13(iv). The department&#039;s reliance on a pending High Court appeal did not alter the position, as no stay had been granted, and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2025 21:17:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=811589" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 1543 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461394</link>
      <description>Imported Wireless Access Points/MIMO products under CTI 8517 62 90 were considered eligible for exemption under the notification dated 01.03.2005, as amended on 11.07.2014, because the Tribunal followed its earlier view that WAPs working on the relevant technology and not supporting LTE standard fell within Serial No. 13(iv). The department&#039;s reliance on a pending High Court appeal did not alter the position, as no stay had been granted, and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461394</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>