<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1550 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461386</link>
    <description>The SC declined to interfere with the HC&#039;s order and dismissed the Special Leave Petition after condoning the delay. The Court explicitly kept any questions of law open for future consideration. This procedural ruling maintains the lower court&#039;s decision while preserving the possibility of addressing the underlying legal issues in subsequent litigation. All pending applications were disposed of alongside the main petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2025 19:02:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=811560" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1550 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461386</link>
      <description>The SC declined to interfere with the HC&#039;s order and dismissed the Special Leave Petition after condoning the delay. The Court explicitly kept any questions of law open for future consideration. This procedural ruling maintains the lower court&#039;s decision while preserving the possibility of addressing the underlying legal issues in subsequent litigation. All pending applications were disposed of alongside the main petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461386</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>