<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (3) TMI 93 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42621</link>
    <description>A customs import prohibition must be read according to its plain wording, and cannot be expanded by implying conditions not expressed in the entry. The Bombay High Court noted that the relevant policy entry was limited to cartridges of 2 1/2 inch size and ammunition containing multiple projectiles exceeding 5 mm, so a cartridge of 2 11/16 inch size was outside the ban. It also treated expert opinion as irrelevant to construing the policy text, because the issue was one of legal interpretation. Past administrative practice allowing similar imports was treated as consistent with that construction, leading to release of the goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 12:47:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81150" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (3) TMI 93 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42621</link>
      <description>A customs import prohibition must be read according to its plain wording, and cannot be expanded by implying conditions not expressed in the entry. The Bombay High Court noted that the relevant policy entry was limited to cartridges of 2 1/2 inch size and ammunition containing multiple projectiles exceeding 5 mm, so a cartridge of 2 11/16 inch size was outside the ban. It also treated expert opinion as irrelevant to construing the policy text, because the issue was one of legal interpretation. Past administrative practice allowing similar imports was treated as consistent with that construction, leading to release of the goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42621</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>