https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461381 A suit for specific performance of an agreement to convey land is not, by itself, a suit for land unless the plaint or reliefs necessarily seek possession or other direct relief in relation to the land. Here, the plaintiff's assertion of existing possession, the ancillary personal injunction against the defendants, and the prayer to declare a later agreement void and cancel it were treated as personal and instrument-focused reliefs rather than claims to title, possession, control or management of the land. On that footing, the suit was not primarily one for land, so leave under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent was not liable to be revoked. en-us Thu, 17 Dec 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Apr 2025 15:59:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461381 A suit for specific performance of an agreement to convey land is not, by itself, a suit for land unless the plaint or reliefs necessarily seek possession or other direct relief in relation to the land. Here, the plaintiff's assertion of existing possession, the ancillary personal injunction against the defendants, and the prayer to declare a later agreement void and cancel it were treated as personal and instrument-focused reliefs rather than claims to title, possession, control or management of the land. On that footing, the suit was not primarily one for land, so leave under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent was not liable to be revoked. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 17 Dec 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461381