<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 115 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768201</link>
    <description>Bombay HC dismissed applicant&#039;s interim application seeking validation of sale agreement dated 29th May 2017 under Section 536(2) of Companies Act, 1956. Court held the sale agreement was incomplete and inchoate as applicant failed to pay stamp duty and registration charges despite being contractually obligated as transferee. The document remained unregistered, making it incapable of validation. Court accepted official liquidator&#039;s contention that applicant had nexus with company&#039;s former management and could not feign ignorance about pending winding up proceedings. Official liquidator&#039;s report directing applicant to surrender property possession was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2025 07:50:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=811341" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 115 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768201</link>
      <description>Bombay HC dismissed applicant&#039;s interim application seeking validation of sale agreement dated 29th May 2017 under Section 536(2) of Companies Act, 1956. Court held the sale agreement was incomplete and inchoate as applicant failed to pay stamp duty and registration charges despite being contractually obligated as transferee. The document remained unregistered, making it incapable of validation. Court accepted official liquidator&#039;s contention that applicant had nexus with company&#039;s former management and could not feign ignorance about pending winding up proceedings. Official liquidator&#039;s report directing applicant to surrender property possession was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768201</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>