<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (12) TMI 46 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42602</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Central Government&#039;s order and holding that the appellant was entitled to the exemption claimed. The judgment clarified that the rubber products used for repairing tires and conveyor belts were exempt from duty under the notification, emphasizing the distinction from products used for resoling or retreading.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2016 14:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81131" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (12) TMI 46 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42602</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Central Government&#039;s order and holding that the appellant was entitled to the exemption claimed. The judgment clarified that the rubber products used for repairing tires and conveyor belts were exempt from duty under the notification, emphasizing the distinction from products used for resoling or retreading.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42602</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>