<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 162 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768248</link>
    <description>Writ petitions were disposed of by granting the petitioner liberty to seek rectification before the statutory authority within the stipulated time. If no rectification application is filed within that period, the impugned orders revive automatically. The court thus preserved the petitioner&#039;s statutory remedy while making continuation of relief conditional on timely action.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2025 07:50:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=811294" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 162 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768248</link>
      <description>Writ petitions were disposed of by granting the petitioner liberty to seek rectification before the statutory authority within the stipulated time. If no rectification application is filed within that period, the impugned orders revive automatically. The court thus preserved the petitioner&#039;s statutory remedy while making continuation of relief conditional on timely action.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768248</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>