https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768251 The HC partially allowed a writ appeal concerning a GST demand order. The court held that the respondent's order demanding Rs. 98,83,029/- violated natural justice principles as it substantially exceeded the Rs. 21,77,261/- specified in the original Show Cause Notice, contrary to Section 75(7) of the GST Act. The HC modified the Single Judge's order by granting the appellant four weeks to submit a reply to the notice and permitted them to raise limitation and jurisdiction defenses. The court rejected the provision that would have automatically restored the impugned order if no reply was filed within the stipulated timeframe. en-us Wed, 26 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Apr 2025 07:50:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768251 The HC partially allowed a writ appeal concerning a GST demand order. The court held that the respondent's order demanding Rs. 98,83,029/- violated natural justice principles as it substantially exceeded the Rs. 21,77,261/- specified in the original Show Cause Notice, contrary to Section 75(7) of the GST Act. The HC modified the Single Judge's order by granting the appellant four weeks to submit a reply to the notice and permitted them to raise limitation and jurisdiction defenses. The court rejected the provision that would have automatically restored the impugned order if no reply was filed within the stipulated timeframe. Case-Laws GST Wed, 26 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768251