<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 166 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768252</link>
    <description>An ex parte order-in-original under the CGST Act was unsustainable because the taxpayers were not given an effective opportunity of hearing as required by section 75(4). The absence of a personal hearing and the resulting inability to respond before adjudication amounted to breach of natural justice, so the adverse order could not be maintained. The HC set aside the order and remanded the matter for fresh de novo adjudication, with directions to grant a proper hearing and allow reconciliation of the relevant returns.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2025 14:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=811290" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 166 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768252</link>
      <description>An ex parte order-in-original under the CGST Act was unsustainable because the taxpayers were not given an effective opportunity of hearing as required by section 75(4). The absence of a personal hearing and the resulting inability to respond before adjudication amounted to breach of natural justice, so the adverse order could not be maintained. The HC set aside the order and remanded the matter for fresh de novo adjudication, with directions to grant a proper hearing and allow reconciliation of the relevant returns.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768252</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>