<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 169 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768255</link>
    <description>The Karnataka High Court set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter for fresh consideration after the petitioner sought to avail the amnesty scheme. The Court directed that the proceedings be treated as proceedings under Section 73 and that appropriate orders be passed under Section 73(9) in accordance with law. It further directed that, if the petitioner files an application, the benefit of the amnesty scheme under Section 128A be granted in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2025 07:50:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=811287" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 169 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768255</link>
      <description>The Karnataka High Court set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter for fresh consideration after the petitioner sought to avail the amnesty scheme. The Court directed that the proceedings be treated as proceedings under Section 73 and that appropriate orders be passed under Section 73(9) in accordance with law. It further directed that, if the petitioner files an application, the benefit of the amnesty scheme under Section 128A be granted in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768255</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>