<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (12) TMI 1430 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461375</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Department&#039;s claim in the resolution plan was treated as a contingent liability because the assessment order was under appeal, and its demand for a higher allocation was not accepted. The tribunal found that the allocation made to the operational creditor was not shown to be below the amount payable in liquidation, so the plan did not require interference on that ground. The claim to secured creditor status was rejected because no basis was established for treating the claimant as a secured operational creditor. The allocation under the approved resolution plan was therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2025 19:00:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=811241" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (12) TMI 1430 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461375</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Department&#039;s claim in the resolution plan was treated as a contingent liability because the assessment order was under appeal, and its demand for a higher allocation was not accepted. The tribunal found that the allocation made to the operational creditor was not shown to be below the amount payable in liquidation, so the plan did not require interference on that ground. The claim to secured creditor status was rejected because no basis was established for treating the claimant as a secured operational creditor. The allocation under the approved resolution plan was therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461375</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>