<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (2) TMI 81 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42588</link>
    <description>The High Court quashed the Tribunal&#039;s orders directing the deposit and dismissal of the appeal, emphasizing the improper exercise of discretion and failure to consider relevant factors. The Court directed the Tribunal to restore the appeal and dispose of it expeditiously on merits without insisting on further deposits, considering the petitioner&#039;s payment compliance and financial constraints.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 11:13:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81117" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (2) TMI 81 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42588</link>
      <description>The High Court quashed the Tribunal&#039;s orders directing the deposit and dismissal of the appeal, emphasizing the improper exercise of discretion and failure to consider relevant factors. The Court directed the Tribunal to restore the appeal and dispose of it expeditiously on merits without insisting on further deposits, considering the petitioner&#039;s payment compliance and financial constraints.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42588</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>