<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 68 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768154</link>
    <description>CESTAT Chennai held that service tax demand under Residential Complex Service was not sustainable for appellants providing composite contract services. The Department had previously dropped proceedings in de-novo order dated 26.06.2014 for the same appellant and projects. Following this precedent decision, CESTAT set aside the impugned appellate order and allowed the appeal, finding the service tax demand for October 2011 to July 2012 period unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2025 08:35:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=811067" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 68 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768154</link>
      <description>CESTAT Chennai held that service tax demand under Residential Complex Service was not sustainable for appellants providing composite contract services. The Department had previously dropped proceedings in de-novo order dated 26.06.2014 for the same appellant and projects. Following this precedent decision, CESTAT set aside the impugned appellate order and allowed the appeal, finding the service tax demand for October 2011 to July 2012 period unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768154</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>