<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 73 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768159</link>
    <description>CESTAT Chennai held that appellants who discharged customs duty with interest under DGFT&#039;s Amnesty Scheme were not liable for redemption fine and penalty despite non-fulfilment of export obligations. The tribunal set aside the fine and penalty imposed in the original orders while confirming the payment of applicable customs duties and interest. The appeal was allowed, providing relief to importers who had regularized their position through the amnesty scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2025 08:35:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=811062" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 73 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768159</link>
      <description>CESTAT Chennai held that appellants who discharged customs duty with interest under DGFT&#039;s Amnesty Scheme were not liable for redemption fine and penalty despite non-fulfilment of export obligations. The tribunal set aside the fine and penalty imposed in the original orders while confirming the payment of applicable customs duties and interest. The appeal was allowed, providing relief to importers who had regularized their position through the amnesty scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768159</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>