https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768162 CESTAT New Delhi dismissed the appeal filed by a courier company against a customs order. The tribunal upheld findings that the appellant violated Regulations 12(1)(iii), (iv), and (v) of CIER 2010 by failing to verify goods and fulfill KYC obligations. The court rejected claims of natural justice violations, noting proper inquiry procedures were followed. The appellant's argument about prohibition from opening consignments was dismissed, as CBEC Circular required 100% screening. The tribunal found it improbable that a courier company providing door-to-door service wouldn't have correct consignee contact details, given their payment and delivery obligations. en-us Tue, 01 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Apr 2025 08:35:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768162 CESTAT New Delhi dismissed the appeal filed by a courier company against a customs order. The tribunal upheld findings that the appellant violated Regulations 12(1)(iii), (iv), and (v) of CIER 2010 by failing to verify goods and fulfill KYC obligations. The court rejected claims of natural justice violations, noting proper inquiry procedures were followed. The appellant's argument about prohibition from opening consignments was dismissed, as CBEC Circular required 100% screening. The tribunal found it improbable that a courier company providing door-to-door service wouldn't have correct consignee contact details, given their payment and delivery obligations. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 01 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768162