<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 80 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768166</link>
    <description>ITAT allowed the appeal against addition under Section 69A for unexplained money. The assessee had provided detailed explanations for cash found, including sale of gold jewelry to relatives and neighbors after spouse&#039;s demise and retention of cash for medical purposes. The AO and CIT(A) ignored these explanations despite adequate supporting details being furnished. The addition was deleted as the assessee successfully explained the source of money.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2025 08:35:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=811055" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 80 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768166</link>
      <description>ITAT allowed the appeal against addition under Section 69A for unexplained money. The assessee had provided detailed explanations for cash found, including sale of gold jewelry to relatives and neighbors after spouse&#039;s demise and retention of cash for medical purposes. The AO and CIT(A) ignored these explanations despite adequate supporting details being furnished. The addition was deleted as the assessee successfully explained the source of money.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768166</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>