<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1644 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461373</link>
    <description>ITAT Bangalore denied deduction under section 80P to assessee for failing to file return of income within prescribed due date under section 139(1). The Tribunal followed Kerala HC precedent in Nileshwar Range case and its own decision in Madhu Souharda case, both ruling in favor of Revenue. The issue was settled law that timely filing of return is mandatory for claiming section 80P deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2025 08:35:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=811040" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1644 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461373</link>
      <description>ITAT Bangalore denied deduction under section 80P to assessee for failing to file return of income within prescribed due date under section 139(1). The Tribunal followed Kerala HC precedent in Nileshwar Range case and its own decision in Madhu Souharda case, both ruling in favor of Revenue. The issue was settled law that timely filing of return is mandatory for claiming section 80P deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461373</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>