<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (9) TMI 104 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42563</link>
    <description>Bulb sleeves and tube light sleeves used for packing electric bulbs and tube lights were not shown to be &quot;printed boxes and cartons&quot; for exemption purposes. The Supreme Court approved the Tribunal&#039;s approach of construing the notification by ordinary meaning, functional character, and market identity, and it accepted the finding that the open-ended sleeves were not boxes or cartons in their ordinary sense and lacked evidence of independent market recognition as such. Because no error was shown in the factual appreciation or legal principle applied, the exemption ruling was upheld and the revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 16:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81092" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (9) TMI 104 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42563</link>
      <description>Bulb sleeves and tube light sleeves used for packing electric bulbs and tube lights were not shown to be &quot;printed boxes and cartons&quot; for exemption purposes. The Supreme Court approved the Tribunal&#039;s approach of construing the notification by ordinary meaning, functional character, and market identity, and it accepted the finding that the open-ended sleeves were not boxes or cartons in their ordinary sense and lacked evidence of independent market recognition as such. Because no error was shown in the factual appreciation or legal principle applied, the exemption ruling was upheld and the revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42563</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>