<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (9) TMI 103 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42562</link>
    <description>Metallised polyester films imported in roll form were treated as a distinct tariff and trade category, not as &quot;sheets&quot;, &quot;foils&quot; or &quot;other rectangular or profile shapes&quot; within the exclusion table of the customs exemption notification. The Court applied commercial parlance and trade identity, noting that plastics notifications and tariff materials consistently distinguished plates, sheets, films and foils. Because roll-form material of indefinite length is not ordinarily understood as a sheet, and the exclusion wording could not be stretched by strained interpretation, the goods remained classifiable as films. The exemption under Section 25(1) of the Customs Act was therefore available and the assessee succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2015 11:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81091" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (9) TMI 103 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42562</link>
      <description>Metallised polyester films imported in roll form were treated as a distinct tariff and trade category, not as &quot;sheets&quot;, &quot;foils&quot; or &quot;other rectangular or profile shapes&quot; within the exclusion table of the customs exemption notification. The Court applied commercial parlance and trade identity, noting that plastics notifications and tariff materials consistently distinguished plates, sheets, films and foils. Because roll-form material of indefinite length is not ordinarily understood as a sheet, and the exclusion wording could not be stretched by strained interpretation, the goods remained classifiable as films. The exemption under Section 25(1) of the Customs Act was therefore available and the assessee succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42562</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>