<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (8) TMI 82 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42550</link>
    <description>Where a complaint, read as a whole with undisputed public records, shows that an accused had already ceased to be a director before the alleged conspiratorial acts, no factual basis exists to connect that person with the alleged offence. The High Court may act on the admitted record in its inherent and supervisory jurisdiction and quash the criminal process, because continuation of prosecution in such circumstances would amount to needless harassment and no offence is disclosed against that accused. The complaint&#039;s own reference to the person as an ex-director, supported by the Registrar of Companies record, was decisive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 18:18:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81079" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (8) TMI 82 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42550</link>
      <description>Where a complaint, read as a whole with undisputed public records, shows that an accused had already ceased to be a director before the alleged conspiratorial acts, no factual basis exists to connect that person with the alleged offence. The High Court may act on the admitted record in its inherent and supervisory jurisdiction and quash the criminal process, because continuation of prosecution in such circumstances would amount to needless harassment and no offence is disclosed against that accused. The complaint&#039;s own reference to the person as an ex-director, supported by the Registrar of Companies record, was decisive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42550</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>