https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42549 The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, stating that they were not liable for the increased Customs duty demanded by the respondents due to delayed clearance from the bonded warehouse. The court found that the petitioners should have been allowed to remove the goods on the payment date and criticized the lack of communication and justification for the refusal of clearance based on a circular. The respondents were directed to pay the petitioners' costs, and the demand for increased duty was deemed invalid. en-us Mon, 31 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Jun 2010 18:17:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42549 The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, stating that they were not liable for the increased Customs duty demanded by the respondents due to delayed clearance from the bonded warehouse. The court found that the petitioners should have been allowed to remove the goods on the payment date and criticized the lack of communication and justification for the refusal of clearance based on a circular. The respondents were directed to pay the petitioners' costs, and the demand for increased duty was deemed invalid. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 31 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42549