<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (6) TMI 62 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42542</link>
    <description>Calcium carbonate in Flagyl tablets was treated as a therapeutically inert pharmaceutical necessity and not as an active ingredient that would disqualify the tablets from the excise exemption under the Rule 8 notification. The formulation contained metronidazole as the only active therapeutic ingredient, while calcium carbonate appeared only in small quantities. Since calcium carbonate acts as an antacid only in much larger doses and the drug authority certified metronidazole as the sole active ingredient, it was regarded as a diluent that did not interfere with the therapeutic or prophylactic activity of the scheduled ingredient. The tablets therefore satisfied the notification conditions and qualified for concessional exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 18:05:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81071" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (6) TMI 62 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42542</link>
      <description>Calcium carbonate in Flagyl tablets was treated as a therapeutically inert pharmaceutical necessity and not as an active ingredient that would disqualify the tablets from the excise exemption under the Rule 8 notification. The formulation contained metronidazole as the only active therapeutic ingredient, while calcium carbonate appeared only in small quantities. Since calcium carbonate acts as an antacid only in much larger doses and the drug authority certified metronidazole as the sole active ingredient, it was regarded as a diluent that did not interfere with the therapeutic or prophylactic activity of the scheduled ingredient. The tablets therefore satisfied the notification conditions and qualified for concessional exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>