<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (7) TMI 102 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42540</link>
    <description>The court found the writ petition premature and discharged the Rule without costs. The petitioners were given four weeks to explain the show cause notice, with authorities directed to proceed lawfully. Interim orders were vacated, and enforcement of the notice of demand was prohibited until the explanation was resolved. The court emphasized the respondents&#039; failure to fulfill their duties properly during the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 18:02:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81069" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (7) TMI 102 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42540</link>
      <description>The court found the writ petition premature and discharged the Rule without costs. The petitioners were given four weeks to explain the show cause notice, with authorities directed to proceed lawfully. Interim orders were vacated, and enforcement of the notice of demand was prohibited until the explanation was resolved. The court emphasized the respondents&#039; failure to fulfill their duties properly during the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42540</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>