<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 3 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768089</link>
    <description>Industrial switchgears marked for industrial use were analysed under the packaged commodities framework and the Central Excise valuation provisions. The text explains that section 4A valuation on retail sale price was not available where the goods were intended for industrial consumers and did not satisfy the statutory conditions for retail-price based assessment; section 4 transaction value therefore applied. It also notes that the extended period of limitation requires suppression of facts with intent to evade duty, which was not established on the disclosed returns, audit history, and declared valuation method. On that basis, interest and penalty were treated as consequential and unsustainable when the demand itself failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2025 17:58:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=810656" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 3 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768089</link>
      <description>Industrial switchgears marked for industrial use were analysed under the packaged commodities framework and the Central Excise valuation provisions. The text explains that section 4A valuation on retail sale price was not available where the goods were intended for industrial consumers and did not satisfy the statutory conditions for retail-price based assessment; section 4 transaction value therefore applied. It also notes that the extended period of limitation requires suppression of facts with intent to evade duty, which was not established on the disclosed returns, audit history, and declared valuation method. On that basis, interest and penalty were treated as consequential and unsustainable when the demand itself failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768089</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>