<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (4) TMI 88 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42536</link>
    <description>For excise levy, an article must fall within the tariff description and also be marketable as goods. The dip solution used in tyre manufacture was held not to be an artificial or synthetic resin under Tariff Item No. 15A(1), and the evidence showed it was not known in the market as a saleable product. Because marketability is an essential ingredient of excisability, the dip solution was not liable to excise duty and relief to the assessee was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 17:54:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81065" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (4) TMI 88 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42536</link>
      <description>For excise levy, an article must fall within the tariff description and also be marketable as goods. The dip solution used in tyre manufacture was held not to be an artificial or synthetic resin under Tariff Item No. 15A(1), and the evidence showed it was not known in the market as a saleable product. Because marketability is an essential ingredient of excisability, the dip solution was not liable to excise duty and relief to the assessee was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42536</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>