https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768101 TASMAC was treated as an enterprise because it carried on economic activity in the distribution and sale of alcoholic beverages, and the relevant market was defined as beer in Tamil Nadu given the distinct product character and State-specific procurement and distribution structure. On the available record, TASMAC was found to enjoy dominance through its exclusive privilege in wholesale and retail vending of liquor and the absence of competitive constraints in that market. The Commission also found a prima facie case that the weighted-average procurement system and brand concentration may be limiting access for other beer brands, and it directed investigation by the Director General. en-us Tue, 25 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 29 Mar 2025 11:10:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768101 TASMAC was treated as an enterprise because it carried on economic activity in the distribution and sale of alcoholic beverages, and the relevant market was defined as beer in Tamil Nadu given the distinct product character and State-specific procurement and distribution structure. On the available record, TASMAC was found to enjoy dominance through its exclusive privilege in wholesale and retail vending of liquor and the absence of competitive constraints in that market. The Commission also found a prima facie case that the weighted-average procurement system and brand concentration may be limiting access for other beer brands, and it directed investigation by the Director General. Case-Laws Law of Competition Tue, 25 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768101