<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (2) TMI 54 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42533</link>
    <description>Customs duty collected after confiscation of imported goods could not be sustained where the goods had already vested in the Government on confiscation. The later assessment and collection of duty on the same goods lacked legal authority, so the customs authorities were required to refund the duty collected from the importer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 17:50:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81062" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (2) TMI 54 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42533</link>
      <description>Customs duty collected after confiscation of imported goods could not be sustained where the goods had already vested in the Government on confiscation. The later assessment and collection of duty on the same goods lacked legal authority, so the customs authorities were required to refund the duty collected from the importer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42533</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>