<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 43 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768129</link>
    <description>Assessment under search proceedings involved addition of unexplained receipts treated as unexplained under the explanation provision; tribunal found the assessing officer could only sustain such addition if supported by incriminating material unearthed during search, applying the requirement that reopening in search assessments must be founded on such material, and there was insufficient incriminating material on record. Consequence: the addition was deleted and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2026 18:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=810616" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 43 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768129</link>
      <description>Assessment under search proceedings involved addition of unexplained receipts treated as unexplained under the explanation provision; tribunal found the assessing officer could only sustain such addition if supported by incriminating material unearthed during search, applying the requirement that reopening in search assessments must be founded on such material, and there was insufficient incriminating material on record. Consequence: the addition was deleted and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>